Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 3:42 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> ... Maybe the error message >> could be bikeshedded ... is "non-table relation" terminology >> that we use in user-facing messages?
> The other option could be "logical replication source relation > \"%s.%s\" is not a table". We use a similar message in > CheckSubscriptionRelkind. Works for me, I'll do it like that if there are no objections. regards, tom lane