On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 6:33 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Huh, doesn't Test::More already provide a sane way to do this? > If not, why isn't die() good enough? (I don't think you can > realistically expect to prohibit die() anywhere in the TAP tests.)
+1 for die. There's very little reason to use BAIL_OUT. If we agree that we need a wrapper for die() for some reason, I can live with that, too, but die is simple and familiar to perl programmers. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
