On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:01 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well this is not really surprising to me because what I have noticed > is that with the new approach the createdb time is completely > dependent upon the template db size. So if the source db size is 10GB > it is taking around 80sec and the shared buffers size does not have a > major impact. Maybe a very small shared buffer can have more impact > so I will test that as well.
OK. Well, then this approach is somewhat worse than I expected for moderately large template databases. But it seems very good for small template databases, especially when there is other work in progress on the system. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
