On 2/11/22 15:47, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:40 PM Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >> I'm not really sure any single parameter name is going to capture the >> subtlety involved here. > I mean to some extent that's inevitable, but it's not a reason not to > do the best we can.
True. I do think we should be wary of any name starting with "LOG", though. Long experience tells us that's something that confuses users when it refers to the WAL. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com