On 2022-Jan-28, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Have you looked at code coverage ? I have an experimental patch to add that > to > cirrus, and ran it with this patch; visible here: > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6362512059793408
Ah, thanks, this is useful. I think it is showing that the new code is generally well covered, but there are some exceptions, particularly ExecMergeMatched in some concurrent cases (TM_Deleted and TM_SelfModified after table_tuple_lock -- those code pages have user-facing errors but are not covered by any tests.) How does this work? I notice it is reporting for src/bin/pg_upgrade/relfilenode.c, but that file is not changed by this patch. -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
