On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:48:15AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > That's already been discussed in [1] and rejected, as it would also mean > losing > the ability to have pg_stat_statements (or any similar extension) coverage > using the regression tests. I personally rely on regression tests for such > custom extensions quite a lot, so I'm still -1 on that.
Well, I can see that this is a second independent complain after a few months. If you wish to keep this capability, wouldn't it be better to add a "regress" mode to compute_query_id, where we would mask automatically this information in the output of EXPLAIN but still run the computation? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
