On 28/01/2022 00:11, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 8:12 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:55 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:
I think the simplest fix is to call register_dirty_segment() from
mdcreate(). As in the attached. Thoughts?

+1

[Testing]

Erm, so now I see my new table in checkpoint's activities:

openat(AT_FDCWD,"base/5/16399",O_RDWR,00)     = 20 (0x14)
fsync(20)                     = 0 (0x0)

... but we still never synchronize "base/5".  According to our
project's reading of the POSIX tea leaves we should be doing that to
nail down the directory entry.

Really? 'base/5' is fsync'd by initdb, when it's created. I didn't think we try to fsync() the directory, when a new file is created in it. We do that with durable_rename() and durable_unlink(), but not with file creation.

Hmm, if a relation is dropped, we use plain unlink() to delete it (at the next checkpoint). Should we use durable_unlink() there, or otherwise arrange to fsync() the parent directory?

- Heikki


Reply via email to