On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:23:07PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Looking at this thread I think it makes sense to go ahead with this patch. > The > filter functionality worked on in another thread is dealing with > cherry-picking > certain objects where this is an all-or-nothing switch, so I don't think they > are at odds with each other.
Including both procedures and functions sounds natural from here. Now I have a different question, something that has not been discussed in this thread at all. What about patterns? Switches like --table or --extension are able to digest a psql-like pattern to decide which objects to dump. Is there a reason not to have this capability for this new switch with procedure names? I mean to handle the case without the function arguments, even if the same name is used by multiple functions with different arguments. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
