On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:28 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2022-01-24 15:35:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > > On 2022-01-14 17:51:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> FWIW, I'm just fine with reverting, particularly in the back branches. > > >> It seems clear that this dank corner of Windows contains even more > > >> creepy-crawlies than we thought. > > > > > Seems we should revert now-ish? There's a minor release coming up and I > > > think > > > it'd be bad to ship these changes to users. > > > > Sure. Do we want to revert in HEAD too? > > Not sure. I'm also OK with trying to go with Thomas' patch to walreceiver and > try a bit longer to get all this working. Thomas?
I vote for reverting in release branches only. I'll propose a better WES patch set for master that hopefully also covers async append etc (which I was already planning to do before we knew about this Windows problem). More soon.
