> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 04:03:41PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 08:55:26AM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > > > > FYI, I've attached this thread to the CF item as an informational one, > > but as there are some patches posted here, folks may get confused. For > > those who have landed here with no context, I feel obliged to mention > > that now there are two alternative patch series posted under the same > > CF item: > > > > * the original one lives in [1], waiting for reviews since the last May > > * an alternative one posted here from Floris > > Ah, I indeed wasn't sure of which patchset(s) should actually be reviewed. > It's nice to have the alternative approach threads linkied in the commit fest, > but it seems that the cfbot will use the most recent attachments as the only > patchset, thus leaving the "original" one untested. > > I'm not sure of what's the best approach in such situation. Maybe creating a > different CF entry for each alternative, and link the other cf entry on the cf > app using the "Add annotations" or "Links" feature rather than attaching > threads?
I don't mind having all of the alternatives under the same CF item, only one being tested seems to be only a small limitation of cfbot.
