On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 12:27 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > It seems to me that what this comment is saying is that OIDs in the > > second and third categories are doled out by counters. Therefore, we > > can't know which of those OIDs will get used, or how many of them will > > get used, or which objects will get which OIDs. Therefore, I think we > > should go back to the approach that you were using for template0 and > > handle both that database and postgres using that method. That is, > > assign an OID manually, and make sure unused_oids knows that it should > > be counted as already used. > > Indeed. If you're going to manually assign OIDs to these databases, > do it honestly, and put them into the range intended for that purpose. > Trying to take short-cuts is just going to cause trouble down the road.
Understood. I will rework the patch accordingly. Thanks Regards, Shruthi KC EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
