On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:49 PM Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > On 1/18/22 04:41, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote: > > In [1] capacity for $SUBJECT was added to most of the batch scripts, > > but clean.bat was not included. I propose to do so with the attached > > patch. > > > That looks a bit ugly. How about this (untested) instead? > > It is WFM, so I am fine with it. > > > By the way, are pgbison.bat and pgflex.bat directly called anywhere? > > Not to my knowledge. One of the things that's annoying about them is > that the processor names are hardcoded, so if you install winflexbison > as I usually do you have to rename the executables (or rename the > chocolatey shims) or the scripts won't work. > > We could use those batches to get to the hardcoded name, but that would probably be as annoying as renaming. If those batches serve no purpose right now, it should be fine to remove them from the tree. I use the executables from a MinGW installation, and they keep their actual name. Regards, Juan José Santamaría Flecha
