On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:54 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Okay. So, based on this feedback, I guess that something like the > attached would be what we are looking for. I have maximized the > amount of code removed with the removal of -z/-Z, but I won't fight > hard if the consensus is to keep them, either. We could also keep > -z/--gzip, and stick -Z to the new --compression-level with > --compress removed.
I mean, I really don't understand the benefit of removing -z and -Z. -z can remain a synonym for --client-compress=gzip and -Z for --client-compress=gzip --compression-level=$N and nobody will be harmed. Taking them out reduces backward compatibility for no gain that I can see. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
