> 8 янв. 2022 г., в 01:56, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> написал(а): >> >> It's discussed in last year's thread. The thinking is that there tends to be >> *fewer* exploitable opportunities between application->DB than between >> browser->app. > > Yes, this was discussed previously and addressed. What else do we need to decide architecturally to make protocol compression happen in 15? As far as I can see - only HBA\GUC part. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Andrey Borodin
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Bruce Momjian
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Justin Pryzby
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Stephen Frost
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Bruce Momjian
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Stephen Frost
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Andrey Borodin
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Justin Pryzby
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Justin Pryzby
- Re: libpq compression (part 2) Justin Pryzby