I wrote: > Aleksander Alekseev <aleksan...@timescale.com> writes: >> 1. Should this behavior be documented in the 9.9.4. AT TIME ZONE >> section or maybe it's documented elsewhere and I just missed it?
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datetime-invalid-input.html ... and reading that again, I realize that I screwed up the fall-back example :-(. 2:30 is not ambiguous; I should have demonstrated the behavior for, say, 1:30. Will fix. regards, tom lane
