Hello, 07.01.2022 09:26, Japin Li wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jan 2022 at 03:21, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > In any case, if we do need same() to implement the identical > behavior to bpchareq(), then the other solution isn't sufficient > either. > > So in short, it seems like we ought to do some compatibility testing > and see if this code misbehaves at all with an index created by the > old code. I don't particularly want to do that ... any volunteers? > > Thanks for your patch, it looks good to me. I'm not sure how to test this. I will test it tomorrow.
Best regards, Alexander
