On 1/5/22 11:03 PM, Corey Huinker wrote: > > There was similar work being done for system periods, which are a bit > simpler but require a side (history) table to be created.
This is false. SYSTEM_TIME periods do not need any kind of history. This was one of the problems I had with Surafel's attempt because it was confusing the period with SYSTEM VERSIONING. Versioning needs the period but the inverse is not true. -- Vik Fearing
