On 1. of April 2018 17:46:38 MESZ wrote Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net>:
>I assume this is a patch that's intended to be applied on top of the >previous patch? If so, please submit the complete pach to make sure the >correct combination ends up actually being reviewed. The v02.patch attached to my last mail contains both source and documentation changes. >Keeping patches as short as possible is not a good thing itself. The >important part is that the resulting code and documentation is the best >possible. Sometimes you might want to turn it into two patches >submitted at >the same time if one is clearly just reorganisation, but avoiding code >restructure just to keep the lines of patch down is not helpful. I think I've made the right compromises regarding readability of the documentation in my patch then. A happy Easter, passover, or Sunday to you Julian
