On 2018-03-31 11:27:14 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I'm just saying that there should be two functions here, rather than > > dropping the old definition, and creating s new one with a default argument. > > So you're asking for something like bt_index_check_heap() + > bt_index_parent_check_heap()? Or, are you talking about function > overloading?
The latter. That addresses my concerns about dropping the function and causing issues due to dependencies. Greetings, Andres Freund
