On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:55 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:22 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:39 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com > > <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > 2) > > > +#include "utils/rel.h" > > > +#include "utils/lsyscache.h" > > > +#include "utils/memutils.h" > > > > > > It might be better to keep the header file in alphabetical order. > > > : > > > +#include "utils/lsyscache.h" > > > +#include "utils/memutils.h" > > > +#include "utils/rel.h" > > > > > > > Right, I'll take care of this as I am already making some other edits > > in the patch. > > > > Fixed this and made a few other changes in the patch that includes (a) > passed down the num_index_scans information in parallel APIs based on > which it can make the decision whether to reinitialize DSM or consider > conditional parallel vacuum clean up; (b) get rid of first-time > variable in ParallelVacuumState as that is not required if we have > num_index_scans information; (c) there seems to be quite a few > unnecessary includes in vacuumparallel.c which I have removed; (d) > unnecessary error callback info was being set in ParallelVacuumState > in leader backend; (e) changed/added comments at quite a few places. > > Can you please once verify the changes in the attached?
Thank you for updating the patch! I agreed with these changes and it looks good to me. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
