Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 08:50:17PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> If pg_upgrade fails and is re-run, it appends to its logfiles, which is
>> confusing since, if it fails again, it then looks like the original error
>> recurred and wasn't fixed. The "append" behavior dates back to 717f6d608.
> Uh, the database server doesn't erase its logs on crash/failure, so why
> should pg_upgrade do that?
The server emits enough information so that it's not confusing:
there are timestamps, and there's an identifiable startup line.
pg_upgrade does neither. If you don't want to truncate as
Justin suggests, you should do that instead.
Personally I like the idea of making a timestamped subdirectory
and dropping all the files in that, because the thing that most
annoys *me* about pg_upgrade is the litter it leaves behind in
$CWD. A subdirectory would make it far easier to mop up the mess.
regards, tom lane
