On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 5:23 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Playing the devil's advocate here: why shouldn't we routinely drop > support for anything that'll be EOL'd when a given PostgreSQL major > release ships? The current policy seems somewhat extreme in the other > direction: our target OS baseline is a contemporary of RHEL 2 or 3 and > Linux 2.4.x, and our minimum compiler is a contemporary of GCC 3.x.
Oops, I take those contemporaries back, I was looking at older documentation... but still the general point stands, can't we be a little more aggressive?
