On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 5:13 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > Oh, I think I misunderstood. Your concern is for the case where the > DBA runs a simple "VACUUM" in single-user mode; you want to skip over > tables that don't really need to advance relfrozenxid, automatically.
Right. > I can see an argument for something like that, but I think that it > should be a variant of VACUUM. Or maybe it could be addressed with a > better user interface; On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:08 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > What if the user tried to reclaim space by vacuuming (via truncation)? Or is > working around some corruption or such? I think this is too much magic. > > That said, having a VACUUM "selector" that selects the oldest tables could be > quite useful. And address this usecase both for single-user and normal > operation. All good points. [Peter again] > single-user mode should prompt the user about > what exact VACUUM command they ought to run to get things going. The current message is particularly bad in its vagueness because some users immediately reach for VACUUM FULL, which quite logically seems like the most complete thing to do. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
