On 2021/11/16 18:55, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
I changed my mind; I’ll update the patch to ignore the error as before, because 1) as far as I know, there are no reports from the field concerning that we ignore all kinds of errors in cleaning up the prepared statements, so maybe we don’t need to change that, and 2) we already committed at least one of the remote transactions, so it’s not good to abort the local transaction unless we really have to.
Are you planning to update the patch? In addition to this change, at least documentation about new parallel_commit parameter needs to be included in the patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
