On 11/30/21 17:26, Tom Lane wrote: > "Bossart, Nathan" <bossa...@amazon.com> writes: >> It looks like the exclusive way has been marked deprecated in all >> supported versions along with a note that it will eventually be >> removed. If it's not going to be removed out of fear of breaking >> backward compatibility, I think the documentation should be updated to >> say that. However, unless there is something that is preventing users >> from switching to the non-exclusive approach, I think it is reasonable >> to begin thinking about removing it. > If we're willing to outright remove it, I don't have any great objection. > My original two cents was that we shouldn't put effort into improving it; > but removing it isn't that. > >
+1 Let's just remove it. We already know it's a footgun, and there's been plenty of warning. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
