On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 7:55 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > When reviewing a recent patch, I missed a place where Datum was being > converted to another type implicitly (ie without going though a > DatumGetXXX() macro). Thanks to Jeff for fixing that (commit > b538c90b), but I was curious to see if I could convince my compiler to > tell me about that sort of thing.
This is a very easy mistake to make, so if you ever feel like returning to this topic in earnest, I think it could be a worthwhile expenditure of time. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
