Sorry, I didn´t explain exactly what I was doing, I just wrote "This replication is a auditing database" on my second email.
Atenciosamente, Em seg., 29 de nov. de 2021 às 09:20, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> escreveu: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:04 PM Marcos Pegoraro <mar...@f10.com.br> wrote: > >> > >> On thinking about this point again, it is not clear to me why that > >> would matter for this particular use case? Basically, when you create > >> a new subscription, it should copy the entire existing data from the > >> table directly and then will decode changes from WAL. So, I think in > >> your case all the changes between pg_upgrade and now should be > >> directly copied from tables, so probably older WAL won't be required. > > > > > > Maybe you did not understand > > > > Yeah, because some information like trigger functions was not there in > your previous emails. > > -- > With Regards, > Amit Kapila. >
