Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 11/26/21 04:12, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 26 Nov 2021, at 05:45, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> Personally I'm not really in favour of outright disabling the C4101
>>>> warning on Windows, because I think it is a useful warning for
>>>> Postgres developers on Windows for cases unrelated to the use of
>>>> PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY.
[ FTR, that text is not mine; somebody messed up the attribution ]
> I agree with Tom. I don't think we should disable the warning. If we
> can't come up with a reasonable implementation of
> PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY that works with MSVC we should just live with
> the warnings. It's not like we get flooded with them.
I think our policy is to suppress unused-variable warnings if they
appear on current mainstream compilers; and it feels a little churlish
to deem MSVC non-mainstream. So I stick with my previous suggestion,
which basically was to disable C4101 until such time as somebody can
make PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY work correctly on MSVC. In the worst
case, that might lead a Windows-based developer to submit a patch that
draws warnings elsewhere ... but the cfbot, other developers, or the
buildfarm will find such problems soon enough.
regards, tom lane
