"Bossart, Nathan" <bossa...@amazon.com> writes: > I periodically hear rumblings about this behavior as well. At the > very least, it certainly ought to be documented if it isn't yet. I > wouldn't mind trying my hand at that. Perhaps we could also add a new > configuration parameter if users really want to take the performance > hit.
A sequence's cache length is already configurable, no?
regards, tom lane
