"Bossart, Nathan" <bossa...@amazon.com> writes: > On 10/9/21, 10:24 AM, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> With the (admittedly later) introduction of planner support functions, >> it's really quite easy to do better. The attached patch adds a planner >> support function for starts_with(), with these benefits:
> The patch looks reasonable to me.
Pushed, thanks for reviewing!
regards, tom lane
