=?utf-8?Q?Dagfinn_Ilmari_Manns=C3=A5ker?= <ilm...@ilmari.org> writes:
> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Based on this, I'm inclined to think we should select 0.98 as the
>> minimum version. Anything later would inconvenience some people.
>> OTOH, it doesn't look like there's any value in promising compatibility
>> with 0.96 instead, especially since I see a couple of subplan-related
>> bug fixes in 0.97 and 0.98 in Test::Simple's changelog.
> FWIW, here's a list of Test::More versions shipped with various Perl
> releases. Since v5.12.0, the version does not change in minor releases.
> ...
> v5.12.0 0.94
> v5.14.0 0.98
Ah-hah, that's a good way to think about it too. There's surely
little reason in worrying about a module version that did not ship
in any Perl release, because what 99.9% of people will have is what
shipped with their Perl release.
regards, tom lane
