On 03/28/2018 08:55 PM, David Steele wrote: > On 3/4/18 11:17 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> >> Furthermore, the patch is yet another victim of fd1a421fe - fixing the >> pg_proc entries is trivial, but a new version is needed. >> >> I'd also like to see an example/explanation how this improves this >> situation compared to only having pg_postmaster_start_time. >> >> So I'm setting this as waiting on author for now. > > I'm not sure why this was set back to Needs Review since it neither > applies cleanly nor builds. >
It likely applied/built fine when it was set to NR, but got broken by some recent commit. > I'm setting this entry to Waiting on Author, but based on the discussion > I think it should be Returned with Feedback. > Fine with me. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
