On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:04 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 7:47 AM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 11:12 AM Bharath Rupireddy > > <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > PSA v2 patch and review it. > > > > I've modified the docs part a bit, please consider v3 for review. > > Thanks for the update patch, Few comments: > 1) Should we change "CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS()" to > "CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() or process specific interrupt handlers"
Done. > 2) Should we mention Postmaster process also along with logger and > statistics collector process > + <glossterm linkend="glossary-backend">backend</glossterm> or the > + <glossterm linkend="glossary-wal-sender">WAL sender</glossterm> or > the > + <glossterm linkend="glossary-auxiliary-proc">auxiliary > process</glossterm> > + with the specified process ID. All of the > + <glossterm linkend="glossary-auxiliary-proc">auxiliary > processes</glossterm> > + are supported except the <glossterm > linkend="glossary-logger">logger</glossterm> > + and the <glossterm > linkend="glossary-stats-collector">statistics collector</glossterm> > + as they are not connected to shared memory the function can > not make requests. > + The backtrace will be logged at <literal>LOG</literal> message level. > + They will appear in the server log based on the log configuration set > + (See <xref linkend="runtime-config-logging"/> for more information), > + but will not be sent to the client regardless of Done. Attaching v4 patch, please review it further. Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
v4-0001-enhance-pg_log_backend_memory_contexts-to-log-mem.patch
Description: Binary data
