On Fri, Nov 12, 2021, at 3:10 AM, houzj.f...@fujitsu.com wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 1:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:50 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > But won't that generate invalidation for the rel twice in the case > > > (change Replica Identity from Nothing to some index) you mentioned in > > > the previous email? > > > > > > > Oh, I see the point. I think this is okay because > > AddRelcacheInvalidationMessage doesn't allow to add duplicate rel > > invalidation. If that is the case I wonder why not simply register > > invalidation without any check in the for loop as was the case with > > Tang's original patch? > > OK, I also think the code in Tang's original patch is fine. > Attach the patch which register invalidation without any check in the for > loop. WFM.
-- Euler Taveira EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
