> On Nov 4, 2021, at 7:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But, is it plausible to add test coverage for the new checks, or is > that going to be too much of a pain?
It only takes about 20 additional lines in the regression test to check the code paths for raw sizes which are too large and too small, so I've done that in this next version. Testing corrupt compressed data in a deterministic, cross platform manner with a compact, easy to maintain regression test has eluded me and is not included here.
v4-0001-Adding-more-toast-pointer-checks-to-amcheck.patch
Description: Binary data
— Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
