On Mon, Nov  1, 2021 at 02:24:36PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I can understand the general idea that we should be sure to engineer
> this in a way that multiple methods can be used, as surely one day folks
> will say that AES128 isn't acceptable any more.  In terms of what we'll
> do from the start, I would think providing the options of AES128 and
> AES256 would be good to ensure that we have the bits covered to support
> multiple methods and I don't think that would put us into a situation of
My patch supports AES128, AES192, and AES256.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.



Reply via email to