On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 02:24:36PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > I can understand the general idea that we should be sure to engineer > this in a way that multiple methods can be used, as surely one day folks > will say that AES128 isn't acceptable any more. In terms of what we'll > do from the start, I would think providing the options of AES128 and > AES256 would be good to ensure that we have the bits covered to support > multiple methods and I don't think that would put us into a situation of
My patch supports AES128, AES192, and AES256. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.