At Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:01:46 +0200, Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunk...@aiven.io> wrote in > Le mardi 26 octobre 2021, 08:27:47 CEST Ronan Dunklau a écrit : > > Yes, I will try to simplify the logic of the patch I sent last week. I'll > > keep you posted here soon. > > I was able to simplify it quite a bit, by using only one standby for both > test > scenarios. > > This test case verify that after a timeline switch, if we resume from a > previous state we will archive: > - segments from the old timeline > - segments from the new timeline > - the timeline history file itself. > > I chose to check against a full segment from the previous timeline, but it > would have been possible to check that the latest timeline segment was > partial. I chose not not, in the unlikely event we promote at an exact > segment > boundary. I don't think it matters much, since partial wal files are already > covered by other tests.
+my @walfiles = glob "$slot_dir/*"; This is not used. Each pg_receivewal run stalls for about 10 or more seconds before finishing, which is not great from the standpoint of recently increasing test run time. Maybe we want to advance LSN a bit, after taking $nextlsn then pass "-s 1" to pg_receivewal. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
