On 10/25/21, 10:18 AM, "Robert Haas" <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 1:14 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossa...@amazon.com> wrote: >> IIUC this would mean that archive modules that need to define GUCs or >> register background workers would have to separately define a >> _PG_init() and be loaded via shared_preload_libraries in addition to >> archive_library. That doesn't seem too terrible to me, but it was >> something I was trying to avoid. > > Hmm. That doesn't seem like a terrible goal, but I think we should try > to find some way of achieving it that looks tidier than this does.
We could just treat archive_library as if it is tacked onto the shared_preload_libraries list. I think I can make that look relatively tidy. Nathan
