> On 25 Oct 2021, at 19:18, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> ... But while I agree it's good to remove unused stuff in the >> master, it doesn't seem like we really need to back-patch it. > > Yeah, exactly. I don't see any benefit that's commensurate with > even a small risk of breaking extensions --- and apparently, in > this case that's not a risk but a certainty.
Since this will cause integer values to have different textual enum value representations in 14 and 15+, do we want to skip two numbers by assigning the next wait event the integer value of WAIT_EVENT_WAL_WRITE incremented by three? Or enum integer reuse not something we guarantee against across major versions? -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
