Hi all, Thank you for the feedback so far!
Attached is a completed implementation (including tests and documentation). Based on the feedback I have received so far, I will be submitting this implementation to the commitfest. Thanks again, Kenaniah On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:05 AM Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Greetings, > > * David G. Johnston (david.g.johns...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On Monday, October 11, 2021, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > > I don't think "just don't grant access to those other databases" > > > is actually a proper answer- there is certainly a use-case for "I want > > > user X to have read access to all tables in *this* database, and also > > > allow them to connect to some other database but not have that same > > > level of access there." > > > > Sure, that has a benefit. But creating a second user for the other > > database and putting the onus on the user to use the correct credentials > > when logging into a particular database is a valid option - it is in > fact > > the status quo. Due to the complexity of adding a whole new grant > > dimension to the system the status quo is an appealing option. Annoyance > > factor aside it technically solves the per-database permissions problem > put > > forth. > > I disagree entirely that forcing users to have multiple accounts and to > deal with "using the correct one" is at all reasonable. That's an utter > hack that results in a given user having multiple different accounts- > something that gets really ugly to deal with in enterprise deployments > which use any kind of centralized authentication system. > > No, that's not a solution. Perhaps there's another way to implement > this capability that is simpler than what's proposed here, but saying > "just give each user two accounts" isn't a solution. Sure, it'll work > for existing released versions of PG, just like there's a lot of things > that people can do to hack around our deficiencies, but that doesn't > change that these are areas which we are lacking and where we should be > trying to provide a proper solution. > > Thanks, > > Stephen >
database-role-memberships-v2.patch
Description: Binary data