On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 03:43:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Mikhail <mp39...@gmail.com> writes: > > In your patch I've removed testing for 5.x versions, because official > > releases are supported only for one year, no need to worry about them. > > Official support or no, we have OpenBSD 5.9 in our buildfarm, so > ignoring the case isn't going to fly.
5.9 has support for unnamed POSIX semas. Do you think new machine with OpenBSD <5.5 (when unnamed POSIX semas were introduced) can appear in buildfarm or be used by real customer? I have no objections on testing "openbsd5.[01234]" and using SysV semas there and can redo and test the patch, but isn't it over caution?
