On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:59:50PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > I think that EDB's pg_catcheck tool can detect problems like this one.
Yes, pg_catcheck is able to catch that. > Perhaps it can be converted into an amcheck/pg_amcheck patch, and > submitted. That would give us very broad coverage. Perhaps. This means the creation of a new database with shared deps in contrib/amcheck/t/. But is amcheck really a correct target here? The fields involved here are an int, some OIDs and a char with a given subset of values making them harder to check. pg_catcheck does checks across catalogs, maintaining a mapping list as of its definitions.c. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
