On 2021-Oct-18, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Thanks. I'm looking at it now. I notice that if I take out the code > fix and keep the tests, I only see the ATTACH side of the problem have a > failure; I expected to see a failure for DETACH too.
Ah, no, the test covers both cases; it's just that if it fails the first time, it'll fail to fail the second time. But if I run it separately, and make it succeed the first time, then the second one will fail as expected. This becomes better visible by adding \c in a few places, but I don't think it's necessary to add it to the committed test -- I'm taking the code as Amit submitted. -- Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ Maybe there's lots of data loss but the records of data loss are also lost. (Lincoln Yeoh)
