On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 6:11 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > To fix it, I thought that we change the create index code and the > vacuum code so that the individual parallel worker sets its status > flags according to the leader’s one. But ISTM it’d be better to copy > the leader’s status flags to workers in ParallelWorkerMain(). I've > attached a patch for HEAD. >
+1 The fix looks reasonable to me too. Is it possible for the patch to add test cases for the two identified problem scenarios? (PROC_IN_VACUUM, PROC_IN_SAFE_IC) Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia
