On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 09:38:45PM +0300, Ants Aasma wrote: > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 23:08, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Yes, I would prefer we don't use the LSN. I only mentioned it since > Ants Aasma mentioned LSN use above. > > > Is there a particular reason why you would prefer not to use LSN? I suggested > it because in my view having a variable tweak is still better than not having > it even if we deem the risks of XTS tweak reuse not important for our use > case. > The comment was made under the assumption that requiring wal_log_hints for > encryption is acceptable.
Well, using the LSN means we have to store the LSN unencrypted, and that means we have to carve out a 16-byte block on the page that is not encrypted. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
