On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 6:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org>
wrote:

> On 2021-Oct-07, Amul Sul wrote:
>
> > While reading this commit (ff9f111bce24), wondered can't we skip
> > missingContrecPtr global variable declaration and calculate that from
> > abortedRecPtr value whenever it needed. IIUC, missingContrecPtr is the
> > next page to the page that abortedRecPtr contain and that can be
> > calculated as "abortedRecPtr + (XLOG_BLCKSZ - (abortedRecPtr %
> > XLOG_BLCKSZ))", thoughts? Please correct me if I'm missing something,
> > thanks.
>
> I don't think that works -- what if the missing record is not on the
> next page but on some future one?  Imagine an enormously large record
> that starts on segment 1, covers all of segment 2 and ends in segment 3.
> We could have flushed segment 2 already, so with your idea we would skip
> ahead only to that position, but really we need to skip all the way to
> the first page of segment 3.
>
> This is easier to imagine if you set wal segment size to 1 MB, but it is
> possible with the default segment size too, since commit records can be
> arbitrarily large, and "logical message" records as well.


Make sense, thanks for the explanation.

Regards,
Amul
-- 
Regards,
Amul Sul
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Reply via email to