On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 11:44 AM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:18:24AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 2:44 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:14:50PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I can see several instances of the > > > > "eval-bool ? true : false" pattern after fd0625c7a9 that are not in > > > > the latest 0002. > > > > > > Yep. There are more of these, and I have just looked at some of them > > > as of the patches proposed. What was sent looked clean enough to > > > progress a bit and be done with it. > > > > While reading the decode.c I found the extra parentheses and arrived > > at this thread. > > I'm not quite sure how you managed to search for it - well done ;)
I could not find the recent thread, though :) > > > The discussion seems to get inactive now but one (0001 > > patch) out of two patches Justin proposed [1] is not committed yet and > > there seems no CF entry for this item (0002 patch already got > > committed, fd0625c7a9). 0001 patch can be cleanly applied and looks > > good to me. > > Note that I also included it here: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210924215827.gs...@telsasoft.com Good. Thank you for the information! Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
