On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:41 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 7:10 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > All of the underlying errors are cases that were clearly intended to > > catch user error -- every single one. But apparently pg_amcheck is > > incapable of error, by definition. Like HAL 9000.
> But this comment seems like mockery to me, and I don't like that. It was certainly not a constructive way of getting my point across. I apologize to Mark. -- Peter Geoghegan
