On 2021/10/04 15:18, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/08/26 1:39, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:50:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
When I applied the patch to the master, I found that the table entries for
those function were added into the table for aclitem functions in the docs.
I think this is not valid position and needs to be moved to the proper one
(maybe the table for system catalog information functions?).
You have to be very careful these days when applying stale patches to
func.sgml --- there's enough duplicate boilerplate that "patch' can easily
be fooled into dumping an addition into the wrong place. I doubt that
the submitter meant the doc addition to go there.
I suppose one solution to this is to use git format-patch -U11 or similar, at
least for doc/
Yes. I moved the desriptions of the function into the table for
system catalog information functions, and made the patch by using
git diff -U6. Patch attached. Barring any objection, I'm thinking
to commit it.
Pushed. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
