Hi, On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:56 AM k.jami...@fujitsu.com <k.jami...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Hi Sawada-san, > > I noticed that this thread and its set of patches have been marked with > "Returned with Feedback" by yourself. > I find the feature (atomic commit for foreign transactions) very useful > and it will pave the road for having a distributed transaction management in > Postgres. > Although we have not arrived at consensus at which approach is best, > there were significant reviews and major patch changes in the past 2 years. > By any chance, do you have any plans to continue this from where you left off?
As I could not reply to the review comments from Fujii-san for almost three months, I don't have enough time to move this project forward at least for now. That's why I marked this patch as RWF. I’d like to continue working on this project in my spare time but I know this is not a project that can be completed by using only my spare time. If someone wants to work on this project, I’d appreciate it and am happy to help. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
